Federal handover of environmental approval powers to the states
The Federal Government’s proposed handover of environmental approval powers to the States for development projects will wind back 30 years of legal protection for the environment and put at risk Australia’s World Heritage Areas such as the Great Barrier Reef, Kakadu and the Tasmanian forests.
If successful, the states would have the power to approve major development projects which have impacts on matters of national environmental significance such as World Heritage Areas, threatened species, water resources and nuclear matters such as uranium mines. For more about these reforms, read:
- One Stop Chop: How regional forests agreements streamline environmental destruction
- Australia’s environment: Breaking the One-stop-shop deadlock, IMPACT! Issue 97, 2016
- Bill before Senate could weaken national environmental oversight, EDO NSW Briefing Note, September 2015
- Federal government to wind back 30 years of legal protection for the environment, EDO NSW blog, 3 September 2014
At the same time, State governments are seeking to ‘fast track’ major developments, such as coal mine and coal seam gas projects, reducing public participation and removing legal rights of local communities to mount legal challenges.
An EDO report shows the gap between the environmental standards in state and national laws is widening, not aligning. See our table below, comparing environmental protection in each state with federal standards.
Public submissions on the draft ‘assessment bilateral’ agreement between the NSW and Commonwealth governments has now closed. Read our submission.
A Senate Committee found that federal - state duplication is minimal and that environmental standards would be put at risk if federal approval powers were delegated to the states. While a recent OECD report on environmental policies found that more technologically advanced industries can benefit from more stringent environmental policies and that environmental policies have no longer-term effects on productivity growth.
State and territory laws do not meet the requirements of Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
*For a full analysis of the laws in each state and territory jurisdiction refer to the full report.